The district prosecutor's office analyzed the state of corruption and economic offenses based on the department's performance in 2020.
In 2020, the district prosecutor's office conducted 4 inspections of compliance with anti-corruption legislation requirements, resulting in more than 16 acts of prosecutorial response.
At the prosecutor's request, 14 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility, and 7 individuals to administrative responsibility.
Control is constantly exercised over the implementation of the prosecutor's requirements outlined in prosecutorial oversight acts, and the actual elimination of violations, causes, and conditions contributing to them. No violations regarding non-compliance with the prosecutor's requirements were identified in 2020.
During supervisory activities, it was noted that corruption and economic offenses are characteristic of virtually all areas of activity in the district.
The main reasons for the violations of anti-corruption legislation identified in 2020 were the negligent attitude of responsible employees of economic entities to their duties, as well as low control by the management of these entities over their work.
The most common corruption offenses identified by the district prosecutor's office in 2020 include offenses related to violations of legislative requirements during procurement.
In 2020, under Part 4 of Article 11.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, at the instruction of the district prosecutor, 7 (3) officials of district organizations were brought to responsibility.
For reference, responsibility under Part 4 of Article 11.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses is established for an official or individual entrepreneur, a member of a commission created to conduct a public procurement procedure, restricting access of suppliers (contractors, performers) to participate in the public procurement procedure, not provided for by law, including by non-compliance with the rules for posting information on public procurement, other violation of the procedure for conducting public procurement in the Republic of Belarus, or an official of the customer (organizer) or individual entrepreneur changing the terms of the contract concluded based on the results of the procurement procedure, unless otherwise provided by legislative acts, as well as their evasion from concluding a contract based on the results of the procurement procedure.
The sanction of the article provides for: a warning or a fine of up to fifty basic units.
Deputy Prosecutor
of Beshenkovichi District
1st Class Lawyer V.V. Doylidov
At the prosecutor's request, 14 officials were brought to disciplinary responsibility, and 7 individuals to administrative responsibility.
Control is constantly exercised over the implementation of the prosecutor's requirements outlined in prosecutorial oversight acts, and the actual elimination of violations, causes, and conditions contributing to them. No violations regarding non-compliance with the prosecutor's requirements were identified in 2020.
During supervisory activities, it was noted that corruption and economic offenses are characteristic of virtually all areas of activity in the district.
The main reasons for the violations of anti-corruption legislation identified in 2020 were the negligent attitude of responsible employees of economic entities to their duties, as well as low control by the management of these entities over their work.
The most common corruption offenses identified by the district prosecutor's office in 2020 include offenses related to violations of legislative requirements during procurement.
In 2020, under Part 4 of Article 11.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses, at the instruction of the district prosecutor, 7 (3) officials of district organizations were brought to responsibility.
For reference, responsibility under Part 4 of Article 11.16 of the Code of Administrative Offenses is established for an official or individual entrepreneur, a member of a commission created to conduct a public procurement procedure, restricting access of suppliers (contractors, performers) to participate in the public procurement procedure, not provided for by law, including by non-compliance with the rules for posting information on public procurement, other violation of the procedure for conducting public procurement in the Republic of Belarus, or an official of the customer (organizer) or individual entrepreneur changing the terms of the contract concluded based on the results of the procurement procedure, unless otherwise provided by legislative acts, as well as their evasion from concluding a contract based on the results of the procurement procedure.
The sanction of the article provides for: a warning or a fine of up to fifty basic units.
Deputy Prosecutor
of Beshenkovichi District
1st Class Lawyer V.V. Doylidov